Start Sean flynn dating 2016

Sean flynn dating 2016

That secrecy—which appeared arbitrary without a public investigative report—undermined community confidence.”But there is nothing in that traditional system—which remains the system for everyone except, apparently, police officers—that requires reviews to be done privately.

Nor is whether a witness is treated with deference or, to borrow phrasing from that 74-page report, as one of the “purported experts” hired by lawyers “representing the Rice family in a federal civil lawsuit.” Only the beginning and the end of the process—the apparently reckless shooting of a black child and the grand jury’s decision that that killing was not unreasonable—are truly public.

Everything in between is either cloaked in legal secrecy or dribbled out in carefully choreographed press releases.

A rookie Cleveland police officer had fired twice at close range, and one bullet hit the boy just left of his belly button, carved downward through his intestines and a major vein, and embedded in his pelvis an inch to the right of center.

The witness, a retired cop named Roger Clark, thought the gun was a curious prop for a grand jury. There is no need for theatrics in grand-jury proceedings. Prosecutors decide what witnesses to call and what evidence to present.

“Does he have to point it at you like this before you shoot? A “perfect storm of human error, mistakes, and miscommunications by all involved,” Cuyahoga County prosecutor Timothy J. The grand jury had been thorough and diligent, he said.

The grand jury had heard all the facts and had reached a reasoned, if difficult, decision.

The boy was dead, and had been for more than a year. They instruct the grand jurors, ordinary citizens drawn from the same pool as trial jurors, on the law.

There is no defense present because the most a grand jury can do is issue an indictment, which means only that there’s enough evidence of a crime that a judge or jury should sort it out. The grand jury was investigating two Cleveland police officers—the rookie who fired and his veteran partner—to determine if there was probable cause to believe that they’d acted unreasonably and unlawfully when they drove to within ten feet of the boy and, even before stopping, shot him.

It is a very low threshold, and it is reached as a matter of plodding routine. Clark is an expert in that general area, police shootings.

He spent more than 27 years with the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department, where, among other things, he taught officers the proper use of force, investigated officers who used deadly force, and helped write tactical deployment guidelines designed to minimize the use of force.

(Mc Ginty’s office, in fact, stressed that point: Clark and other witnesses “can characterize their experience before the Grand Jury in any way they want, but prosecutors cannot reveal what was said or done in the room,” a spokesman e-mailed me.